最近博主买了真云数据的洛杉矶I型这款,HHD硬盘,从测试看,硬盘I/O非常OK,有500-900左右,据商家说是HHD阵列RAID10,堪比 SSD 盘,不过一个月要29元,这次没有惊喜噢,伤心(ಥ_ಥ),喜欢的小伙伴们可以看看噢!我们下面就来对这款机器进行测评!
测评机器配置:
- CPU:1核心(Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz)
- 内存:512 M
- 硬盘:35G HHD RAID10
- 带宽:10Mbps
- 流量:无限制
- Hyper-V 虚拟化技术
- 星外控制面板
更多优惠套餐:
测试 IP:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号 : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
CPU 核心数 : 1
CPU 频率 : 3499.971 MHz
总硬盘大小 : 8.8 GB (1.0 GB Used)
总内存大小 : 482 MB (189 MB Used)
SWAP大小 : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长 : 0 days, 0 hour 10 min
系统负载 : 1.46, 0.64, 0.27
系统 : CentOS 6.8
架构 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核 : 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64
虚拟化平台 : hyperv
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 439 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 680 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 709 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
使用ZBench脚本进行的国外测速:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称 IP地址 下载速度 延 迟
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 11.2MB/s 0.641 ms
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 4.13MB/s 169.884 ms
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 3.86MB/s 225.182 ms
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 7.09MB/s 97.604 ms
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 6.41MB/s 115.087 ms
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 4.53MB/s 70.564 ms
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 11.0MB/s 32.327 ms
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 9.36MB/s 71.755 ms
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 5.37MB/s 121.208 ms
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 3.07MB/s 237.314 ms
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 5.53MB/s 213.054 ms
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
使用ZBench脚本进行的国内测速:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称 上传速度 下载速度 延 迟
襄阳电信 6.78 Mbit/s 27.86 Mbit/s 440.032 ms
上海电信 1.15 Mbit/s 19.27 Mbit/s 674.633 ms
西安电信 7.59 Mbit/s 20.12 Mbit/s 396.376 ms
上海联通 8.68 Mbit/s 27.44 Mbit/s 263.327 ms
重庆联通 3.76 Mbit/s 10.63 Mbit/s 571.99 ms
北京电信 3.13 Mbit/s 2.58 Mbit/s 000.000 ms
北京联通 3.19 Mbit/s 24.32 Mbit/s 422.533 ms
湖南电信 4.15 Mbit/s 29.14 Mbit/s 267.95 ms
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥 : 275.17 ms 北京 : 244.12 ms 武汉 : 250.34 ms
昌吉 : 337.73 ms 成都 : 299.86 ms 上海 : 399.57 ms
太原 : 242.84 ms 杭州 : 298.53 ms 宁夏 : 271.74 ms
呼和浩特 : 262.53 ms 南昌 : Fail 拉萨 : 275.46 ms
乌鲁木齐 : 289.85 ms 天津 : 248.75 ms 襄阳 : Fail
郑州 : 278.9 ms 沈阳 : 274.23 ms 兰州 : 260.71 ms
哈尔滨 : 304.58 ms 宁波 : 381.41 ms 苏州 : 377.51 ms
济南 : 244.87 ms 西安 : 255.94 ms 西宁 : 253.16 ms
重庆 : 324.71 ms 深圳 : 295.36 ms 南京 : 274.9 ms
长沙 : 416.85 ms 长春 : 258.4 ms 福州 : 231.72 ms
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
在线查看真云数据(VMSSR) 洛杉矶I型的ZBeach测评报告:https://zbench.kirito.moe/record-cn.php?IKEY=12251
使用SuperBench脚本进行性能测试:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
CPU Cores : 1 Cores @ 3499.971 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 8192 KB
OS : CentOS 6.8 (64 Bit) Hyper-V
Kernel : 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64
Total Space : 8.8 GB (1.1 GB Used)
Total RAM : 482 MB (211 MB Used 14 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 1023 MB (0 MB Used)
Uptime : 0 days 2 hour 44 min
Load average : 0.60, 0.30, 0.16
ASN & ISP : AS18978, Enzu
Organization : Enzu
Location : Florida, United States / US
Region : Florida
----------------------------------------------------------------------
使用SuperBench脚本进行的国外测速:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 10.10 Mbit/s 90.38 Mbit/s 67.774 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 92.2 Mbit/s 0.000 ms
Shanghai CT 0.92 Mbit/s 10.92 Mbit/s 734.875 ms
Hangzhou CT 8.74 Mbit/s 32.86 Mbit/s 334.826 ms
Chengdu CT 1.40 Mbit/s 30.40 Mbit/s 607.637 ms
Shanghai CU 8.55 Mbit/s 23.87 Mbit/s 305.85 ms
Xi'an CU 7.63 Mbit/s 21.09 Mbit/s 629.377 ms
Chongqing CU 7.65 Mbit/s 19.13 Mbit/s 528.795 ms
Xi'an CM 8.67 Mbit/s 33.77 Mbit/s 492.475 ms
Kunming CM 9.14 Mbit/s 19.08 Mbit/s 0.000 ms
Guangzhou CM 9.07 Mbit/s 14.72 Mbit/s 530.314 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
在线查看真云数据(VMSSR) 洛杉矶I型的SuperBench测评报告:https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/3gFm9wzVKq/
使用Bench脚本进行性能测试:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 3499.971 MHz
Total size of Disk : 8.8 GB (2.6 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 482 MB (475 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 1023 MB (1 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 19 hour 18 min
Load average : 1.08, 0.53, 0.24
OS : CentOS 6.8
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O speed(1st run) : 655 MB/s
I/O speed(2nd run) : 807 MB/s
I/O speed(3rd run) : 812 MB/s
Average I/O speed : 758.0 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
使用Bench脚本进行的国外IPv4&IPv6测速:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv4 address Download Speed
CacheFly 205.234.175.175 11.2MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 106.187.96.148 6.53MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 139.162.23.4 5.03MB/s
Linode, London, UK 176.58.107.39 7.75MB/s
Linode, Frankfurt, DE 139.162.130.8 6.68MB/s
Linode, Fremont, CA 50.116.14.9 8.04MB/s
Softlayer, Dallas, TX 173.192.68.18 11.0MB/s
Softlayer, Seattle, WA 67.228.112.250 7.22MB/s
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE 159.122.69.4 10.0MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 119.81.28.170 3.81MB/s
Softlayer, HongKong, CN 119.81.130.170 5.16MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name IPv6 address Download Speed
Linode, Atlanta, GA 2600:3c02::4b 10.7MB/s
Linode, Dallas, TX 2600:3c00::4b 10.6MB/s
Linode, Newark, NJ 2600:3c03::4b 10.8MB/s
Linode, Singapore, SG 2400:8901::4b 3.44MB/s
Linode, Tokyo, JP 2400:8900::4b 4.40MB/s
Softlayer, San Jose, CA 2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4 9.18MB/s
Softlayer, Washington, WA 2607:f0d0:3001:78::2 2.58MB/s
Softlayer, Paris, FR 2a03:8180:1301:8::4 9.92MB/s
Softlayer, Singapore, SG 2401:c900:1101:8::2 3.21MB/s
Softlayer, Tokyo, JP 2401:c900:1001:16::4 4.36MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
使用mPing回程测试:
-------------------------------------------
【四川 电信】 - 125.64.38.178
20 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 29000ms
-------------------------------------------
【北京 电信】 - 106.120.243.142
20 packets transmitted, 18 received, 10% packet loss, time 20019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 406.408/407.145/408.019/0.491 ms
-------------------------------------------
【北京 联通】 - 103.254.70.52
20 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 28999ms
-------------------------------------------
【北京 移动】 - 218.205.152.14
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19277ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 248.544/249.087/250.235/0.788 ms
-------------------------------------------
【上海 移动】 - 117.131.14.202
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19265ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 239.415/240.419/242.196/0.716 ms
-------------------------------------------
【上海 电信】 - 211.144.205.58
20 packets transmitted, 14 received, 30% packet loss, time 20015ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 239.320/240.040/241.662/0.875 ms
-------------------------------------------
【上海 联通】 - 220.196.42.133
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19274ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 250.079/251.554/257.591/2.033 ms
-------------------------------------------
【广东 电信】 - 121.11.69.135
20 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 28999ms
-------------------------------------------
【广东 联通】 - 27.40.0.30
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19242ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 208.808/211.640/215.945/2.818 ms
-------------------------------------------
【广东 移动】 - 211.139.129.222
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19248ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 222.862/225.049/227.149/1.131 ms
-------------------------------------------
min:最低延迟
avg:平均延迟
max:最高延迟
mdev:平均偏差
-------------------------------------------
总结
基本上可以用三个字形容:还可以,反正一个月才29(比digitalocean还便宜一点),CPU也海星,做什么都行了(疯狂暗示),另外就是I/O也都还行,I/O有一次我测的最高是900 MB/S,这款机器建站还是不错的。