关于套餐
本次测评感谢商家提供测试机
本次使用的是1G内存那款，通过萌咖的网络重装脚本重装系统为Debian8 X64（发现Debian9坑有点多），开启内核BBR加速
更多测试脚本可参考
基础信息
| 项目 | 数据 |
|---|---|
| CPU 型号 | QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) |
| CPU 核心数 | 2 |
| CPU 主频 | 1795.672 MHz |
| 硬盘大小 | 9.3 GB (0.7 GB 已使用) |
| 内存大小 | 990 MB (299 MB 已使用) |
| SWAP 交换空间大小 | 465 MB (0 MB 已使用) |
| 在线时长 | 0 days, 0 hour 4 min |
| 系统负载 | 0.49, 0.11, 0.04 |
| 系统 | Debian GNU/Linux 8 |
| 架构 | x86_64 (64 位) |
| 核心 | 4.9.117-0409117-generic |
| 虚拟化技术 | kvm |
磁盘IO
| 次数 | 速度 |
|---|---|
| 第一次测试 | 232 MB/s |
| 第二次测试 | 375 MB/s |
| 第三次测试 | 429 MB/s |
Unixbench测试
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: debian: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 4.9.117–0409117–generic — #201808030631 SMP Fri Aug 3 06:34:09 UTC 2018
Machine: x86_64 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=“UTF-8”, collate=“UTF-8”)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64–rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)
x86–64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64–rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)
x86–64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
09:57:49 up 17 min, 2 users, load average: 0.71, 0.28, 0.14; runlevel 5
————————————————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 09:57:49 – 10:25:38
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21664727.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double–Precision Whetstone 2412.8 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 991.8 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 135474.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 34536.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 515043.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 191679.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe–based Context Switching 13398.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2753.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3424.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 943.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 219372.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21664727.2 1856.4
Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 2412.8 438.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 991.8 230.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 135474.7 342.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34536.6 208.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 515043.3 888.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 191679.5 154.1
Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 13398.9 33.5
Process Creation 126.0 2753.4 218.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3424.0 807.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 943.8 1573.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 219372.6 146.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 341.3
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21664727.2 1856.4
Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 2412.8 438.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 991.8 230.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 135474.7 342.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34536.6 208.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 515043.3 888.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 191679.5 154.1
Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 13398.9 33.5
Process Creation 126.0 2753.4 218.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3424.0 807.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 943.8 1573.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 219372.6 146.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 341.3
————————————————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 10:25:38 – 10:53:29
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45545570.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double–Precision Whetstone 4847.4 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4313.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 372515.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88842.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1346911.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 527089.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe–based Context Switching 143710.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10617.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8434.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1184.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 443727.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45545570.9 3902.8
Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 4847.4 881.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 4313.8 1003.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 372515.9 940.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88842.7 536.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1346911.0 2322.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 527089.0 423.7
Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 143710.1 359.3
Process Creation 126.0 10617.7 842.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8434.2 1989.2
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1184.5 1974.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 443727.5 295.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 958.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
|
双核超线程的较为不错！
带宽测试
国外网络测试
| 节点 | IP 地址 | 下载速度 | 延迟 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CacheFly | 205.234.175.175 | 3.82MB/s | 0.746 ms |
| Linode 日本 | 106.187.96.148 | 3.70MB/s | 103.514 ms |
| Linode 新加坡 | 139.162.23.4 | 3.25MB/s | 182.770 ms |
| Linode 英国 | 176.58.107.39 | 3.70MB/s | 140.784 ms |
| Linode 法兰克福 | 139.162.130.8 | 3.71MB/s | 152.387 ms |
| Linode 加拿大 | 50.116.14.9 | 3.86MB/s | 8.766 ms |
| Softlayer 达拉斯 | 173.192.68.18 | 3.69MB/s | 40.385 ms |
| Softlayer 西雅图 | 67.228.112.250 | 3.71MB/s | 26.443 ms |
| Softlayer 法兰克福 | 159.122.69.4 | 3.25MB/s | 152.330 ms |
| Softlayer 新加坡 | 119.81.28.170 | 3.47MB/s | 223.491 ms |
| Softlayer 香港 | 119.81.130.170 | 3.01MB/s | 179.170 ms |
国内网络测试
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
|
———————————————————————————————————
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 34.33 Mbit/s 31.35 Mbit/s 2.829 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 32.3 Mbit/s 0.000 ms
Shanghai CT 33.37 Mbit/s 26.83 Mbit/s 151.195 ms
Hangzhou CT 15.98 Mbit/s 26.03 Mbit/s 203.747 ms
Chengdu CT 31.71 Mbit/s 26.04 Mbit/s 290.218 ms
Shanghai CU 28.56 Mbit/s 16.12 Mbit/s 180.79 ms
Xi‘an CU 19.71 Mbit/s 21.71 Mbit/s 341.207 ms
Chongqing CU 26.10 Mbit/s 24.01 Mbit/s 270.309 ms
Xi’an CM 21.49 Mbit/s 27.68 Mbit/s 245.069 ms
Chengdu CM 20.20 Mbit/s 13.96 Mbit/s 189.68 ms
Kunming CM 23.30 Mbit/s 24.74 Mbit/s 198.665 ms
Guangzhou CM 30.52 Mbit/s 26.31 Mbit/s 164.954 ms
———————————————————————————————————
|
