|测评|OLVPS|美国洛杉矶Cera GIA VPS测评报告

关于套餐

『VPS』OLVPS-512M内存/8G硬盘/512G流量/KVM/洛杉矶Cera GIA/月付39.99元

OLVPS，曾用名T667、Corecache，为EQ大佬的站点，目前上线了洛杉矶Cera GIA线路的主机，三网回程均…

本次测评感谢商家提供测试机

本次使用的是1G内存那款，通过萌咖的网络重装脚本重装系统为Debian8 X64（发现Debian9坑有点多），开启内核BBR加速

更多测试脚本可参考

『工具』VPS常用测试脚本合集

平时测试VPS的时候，总是要找各种各样的脚本，所以就想做个合集，方便一下自己…… 综合测试脚本 ※这类脚本是综合测试VP…

基础信息

项目	数据
CPU 型号	QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU 核心数	2
CPU 主频	1795.672 MHz
硬盘大小	9.3 GB (0.7 GB 已使用)
内存大小	990 MB (299 MB 已使用)
SWAP 交换空间大小	465 MB (0 MB 已使用)
在线时长	0 days, 0 hour 4 min
系统负载	0.49, 0.11, 0.04
系统	Debian GNU/Linux 8
架构	x86_64 (64 位)
核心	4.9.117-0409117-generic
虚拟化技术	kvm

磁盘IO

次数	速度
第一次测试	232 MB/s
第二次测试	375 MB/s
第三次测试	429 MB/s

Unixbench测试

========================================================================

BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

System: debian: GNU/Linux

OS: GNU/Linux — 4.9.117–0409117–generic — #201808030631 SMP Fri Aug 3 06:34:09 UTC 2018

Machine: x86_64 (unknown)

Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=“UTF-8”, collate=“UTF-8”)

CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64–rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)

x86–64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET

CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64–rhel6) (3591.3 bogomips)

x86–64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET

09:57:49 up 17 min, 2 users, load average: 0.71, 0.28, 0.14; runlevel 5

————————————————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 09:57:49 – 10:25:38

2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 21664727.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double–Precision Whetstone 2412.8 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 991.8 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 135474.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 34536.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 515043.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 191679.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe–based Context Switching 13398.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 2753.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3424.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 943.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 219372.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21664727.2 1856.4

Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 2412.8 438.7

Execl Throughput 43.0 991.8 230.6

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 135474.7 342.1

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34536.6 208.7

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 515043.3 888.0

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 191679.5 154.1

Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 13398.9 33.5

Process Creation 126.0 2753.4 218.5

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3424.0 807.5

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 943.8 1573.1

System Call Overhead 15000.0 219372.6 146.2

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 341.3

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 21664727.2 1856.4

Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 2412.8 438.7

Execl Throughput 43.0 991.8 230.6

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 135474.7 342.1

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 34536.6 208.7

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 515043.3 888.0

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 191679.5 154.1

Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 13398.9 33.5

Process Creation 126.0 2753.4 218.5

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3424.0 807.5

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 943.8 1573.1

System Call Overhead 15000.0 219372.6 146.2

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 341.3

————————————————————————————————————

Benchmark Run: Fri Aug 03 2018 10:25:38 – 10:53:29

2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 45545570.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double–Precision Whetstone 4847.4 MWIPS (9.4 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 4313.8 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 372515.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88842.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1346911.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 527089.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe–based Context Switching 143710.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 10617.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8434.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1184.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 443727.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 45545570.9 3902.8

Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 4847.4 881.3

Execl Throughput 43.0 4313.8 1003.2

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 372515.9 940.7

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88842.7 536.8

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1346911.0 2322.3

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 527089.0 423.7

Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 143710.1 359.3

Process Creation 126.0 10617.7 842.7

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8434.2 1989.2

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1184.5 1974.1

System Call Overhead 15000.0 443727.5 295.8

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 958.7

======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

双核超线程的较为不错！

带宽测试

『测评』OLVPS-美国洛杉矶Cera GIA VPS测评报告-Mr.KevinH

国外网络测试

节点	IP 地址	下载速度	延迟
CacheFly	205.234.175.175	3.82MB/s	0.746 ms
Linode 日本	106.187.96.148	3.70MB/s	103.514 ms
Linode 新加坡	139.162.23.4	3.25MB/s	182.770 ms
Linode 英国	176.58.107.39	3.70MB/s	140.784 ms
Linode 法兰克福	139.162.130.8	3.71MB/s	152.387 ms
Linode 加拿大	50.116.14.9	3.86MB/s	8.766 ms
Softlayer 达拉斯	173.192.68.18	3.69MB/s	40.385 ms
Softlayer 西雅图	67.228.112.250	3.71MB/s	26.443 ms
Softlayer 法兰克福	159.122.69.4	3.25MB/s	152.330 ms
Softlayer 新加坡	119.81.28.170	3.47MB/s	223.491 ms
Softlayer 香港	119.81.130.170	3.01MB/s	179.170 ms

国内网络测试

———————————————————————————————————

Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency

Speedtest.net 34.33 Mbit/s 31.35 Mbit/s 2.829 ms

Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 32.3 Mbit/s 0.000 ms

Shanghai CT 33.37 Mbit/s 26.83 Mbit/s 151.195 ms

Hangzhou CT 15.98 Mbit/s 26.03 Mbit/s 203.747 ms

Chengdu CT 31.71 Mbit/s 26.04 Mbit/s 290.218 ms

Shanghai CU 28.56 Mbit/s 16.12 Mbit/s 180.79 ms

Xi‘an CU 19.71 Mbit/s 21.71 Mbit/s 341.207 ms

Chongqing CU 26.10 Mbit/s 24.01 Mbit/s 270.309 ms

Xi’an CM 21.49 Mbit/s 27.68 Mbit/s 245.069 ms

Chengdu CM 20.20 Mbit/s 13.96 Mbit/s 189.68 ms

Kunming CM 23.30 Mbit/s 24.74 Mbit/s 198.665 ms

Guangzhou CM 30.52 Mbit/s 26.31 Mbit/s 164.954 ms

———————————————————————————————————

|测评|OLVPS|美国洛杉矶Cera GIA VPS测评报告

关于套餐

『VPS』OLVPS-512M内存/8G硬盘/512G流量/KVM/洛杉矶Cera GIA/月付39.99元

『工具』VPS常用测试脚本合集

基础信息