最近#金山云#618活动，推出的活动机型超级划算！5M带宽的云服务器仅88元一年！
不过获得购买资格比较费劲一些，需要自己建团，然后有人入团且购买服务器后，团长才有资格！88元购买，否则需要200多！
有不少童鞋已经跃跃欲试了！童鞋不用着急购买，先看完本文测评再下手吧！！
云服务器测评内容全是博主亲测，商家后来配置变更/网络变化，博主不在变更本文内容！内容仅供参考！!
机器配置
型号：基础型E1（E1.1B）
CPU：1核
内存：2G
磁盘：20G（SSD）
带宽：5M
虚拟：KVM
IPv4：1个
数据中心：北京，上海，广州
操作系统：Linux / Windows
价格：88元一年（续费原价）
购买：https://activity.ksyun.com/promotion-midyear.html
配置测试
CPU这个型号被修改了，和客服沟通后说是Intel #Xeon# E5！
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
———————————————————————————————————
CPU model : Ksyun Virtual CPU(ksyun–cpu64)
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency : 2599.998 MHz
Total size of Disk : 20.0 GB (2.4 GB Used)
Total amount of Mem : 1838 MB (66 MB Used)
Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
System uptime : 0 days, 0 hour 6 min
Load average : 0.01, 0.15, 0.12
OS : CentOS 7.6.1810
Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel : 3.10.0–957.27.2.el7.x86_64
———————————————————————————————————
|
磁盘IO
平均IO为 839MB/s，这个IO波动有点大！
|
1
2
3
4
|
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 526 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 967 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 1.0 GB/s
Average I/O Speed : 839.0 MB/s
|
测试IP
120.92.123.3
网络延迟
国内延迟不错！国外也还不错！
最快北京[多线] 3ms / 最慢新加坡 241ms / 平均42.9ms
| 线路 | 最快节点 | 最慢节点 | 平均响应 |
| 电信 | 山东枣庄18ms | 云南昆明78ms | 34.6ms |
| 多线 | 北京3ms | 广东深圳46ms | 23.4ms |
| 联通 | 天津6ms | 福建福州42ms | 25.7ms |
| 移动 | 江苏常州28ms | 浙江金华37ms | 33.8ms |
| 海外 | 中国香港41ms | 新加坡241ms | 87ms |
网络丢包
测试时间下午7点左右！国内表现良好！境外大部分地址丢包还不算太严重！
网络速度
上行速度基本符合宣传的#5Mbit/s#， 下行速度应该是 50Mbit/s左右!
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
|
测试节点 上传速度 下载速度
Speedtest.net 6.18 Mbit/s 54.71 Mbit/s
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 32.5 Mbit/s
Nanning CT 7.18 Mbit/s 43.04 Mbit/s
Guangzhou 5G CT 6.56 Mbit/s 43.63 Mbit/s
Chongqing CT 6.32 Mbit/s 53.46 Mbit/s
Changsha CT 6.30 Mbit/s 51.54 Mbit/s
Wuhan CT 6.50 Mbit/s 61.52 Mbit/s
Hefei 5G CT 5.82 Mbit/s 49.90 Mbit/s
Hangzhou CT 6.67 Mbit/s 41.19 Mbit/s
Nanjing 5G CT 6.33 Mbit/s 52.88 Mbit/s
Shanghai CT 7.08 Mbit/s 44.25 Mbit/s
Suzhou 5G CT 6.75 Mbit/s 50.81 Mbit/s
Lianyungang5G CT 6.65 Mbit/s 51.34 Mbit/s
Guangzhou 5G CU 5.94 Mbit/s 50.74 Mbit/s
Changsha CU 6.34 Mbit/s 62.99 Mbit/s
Fuzhou CU 7.02 Mbit/s 48.97 Mbit/s
Tianjin 5G CU 4.18 Mbit/s 58.95 Mbit/s
Chengdu CU 6.44 Mbit/s 47.31 Mbit/s
Nanning CU 6.54 Mbit/s 62.24 Mbit/s
Wuhan CU 6.07 Mbit/s 47.35 Mbit/s
Hefei CU 6.33 Mbit/s 55.88 Mbit/s
Beijing CU 5.67 Mbit/s 58.60 Mbit/s
Nanjing CU 4.49 Mbit/s 42.87 Mbit/s
ShangHai 5G CU 5.54 Mbit/s 29.22 Mbit/s
Changchun CU 6.40 Mbit/s 61.42 Mbit/s
Xi an CU 5.09 Mbit/s 61.30 Mbit/s
Harbin CM 7.15 Mbit/s 51.06 Mbit/s
ZhenJiang CM 5.15 Mbit/s 55.22 Mbit/s
Wuxi 5G CM 6.34 Mbit/s 27.22 Mbit/s
Nanjing 5G CM 4.44 Mbit/s 18.87 Mbit/s
Ningbo 5G CM 5.36 Mbit/s 50.53 Mbit/s
Hefei 5G CM 5.28 Mbit/s 48.56 Mbit/s
ChangSha 5G CM 6.85 Mbit/s 62.27 Mbit/s
Guangzhou CM 6.47 Mbit/s 38.86 Mbit/s
Hangzhou CM 6.84 Mbit/s 73.52 Mbit/s
|
内存测试
内存能分配到3.5G左右！
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
|
3480MB allocated
3490MB allocated
3500MB allocated
3510MB allocated
3520MB allocated
3530MB allocated
3540MB allocated
3550MB allocated
3560MB allocated
3570MB allocated
3580MB allocated
Killed
|
DB测试
MyISAM引擎 100 并发查询时间： 1.386秒
MyISAM引擎 1000并发查询时间：2.029秒
InnoDB引擎 100 并发查询时间： 1.093秒
InnoDB引擎 1000并发查询时间：1.95秒
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
|
Benchmark
Running for engine myisam
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.378 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.344 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.438 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 100
Average number of queries per client: 20
Benchmark
Running for engine myisam
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 2.026 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.976 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 2.086 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 1000
Average number of queries per client: 2
Benchmark
Running for engine innodb
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.092 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.070 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.119 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 100
Average number of queries per client: 20
Benchmark
Running for engine innodb
Average number of seconds to run all queries: 1.888 seconds
Minimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.668 seconds
Maximum number of seconds to run all queries: 2.295 seconds
Number of clients running queries: 1000
Average number of queries per client: 2
|
性能跑分
跑分仅为：550.6！！
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
|
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: vm10–0–0–24: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0–957.27.2.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Mon Jul 29 17:46:05 UTC 2019
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=“UTF-8”, collate=“UTF-8”)
CPU 0: Ksyun Virtual CPU(ksyun–cpu64) (5200.0 bogomips)
x86–64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
23:18:59 up 5:36, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05; runlevel 3
————————————————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 19 2020 23:18:59 – 23:47:05
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33374627.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double–Precision Whetstone 4185.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2150.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 221745.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 55442.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 694503.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 293374.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe–based Context Switching 80047.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6818.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3372.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 462.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 304404.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33374627.6 2859.9
Double–Precision Whetstone 55.0 4185.3 761.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 2150.0 500.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 221745.0 560.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 55442.9 335.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 694503.1 1197.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 293374.4 235.8
Pipe–based Context Switching 4000.0 80047.2 200.1
Process Creation 126.0 6818.1 541.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3372.1 795.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 462.7 771.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 304404.8 202.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 550.6
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
|
并发测试
50KB静态页面测试 并发 ≈ 1000
请求服务器：腾讯云重庆云服务器延迟50毫秒
|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
Server Software: nginx
Server Hostname: 120.92.123.1
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /50kb.html
Document Length: 51276 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1000
Time taken for tests: 95.562 seconds
Complete requests: 1000
Failed requests: 162
(Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 162, Exceptions: 0)
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 50001600 bytes
HTML transferred: 49749600 bytes
Requests per second: 10.46 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 95562.204 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 95.562 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 510.97 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/–sd] median max
Connect: 41 53 4.8 54 66
Processing: 190 48434 17302.8 49469 95415
Waiting: 43 4486 10806.9 711 80115
Total: 237 48487 17302.9 49512 95461
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 49512
66% 56441
75% 60386
80% 62632
90% 71801
95% 76680
98% 82183
99% 84973
100% 95461 (longest request)
|
最后总结
以下是马甲客观评价！本文测试大概用了3天的时间！
服务器性能：CPU官宣是Intel Xeon E5系列处理器。但是性能跑分非常不理想！
网络情况：网络情况还不错！
价格情况：价格算是超便宜了。
计费方式：按月/年计费。
能否建站： 可以，并发能力表现良好。
能否趴强：不支持。
工单服务：支持#工单#，也支持#在线客服#，回复还是比较快的（这个比较不错！）。
商家口碑：暂时没发现特别的黑历史。
能否退货：特价机型非特殊原因不退。
控制面板：支持监控统计(比较简单)，防火墙，SSH密钥，弹性IP，自定义系统镜像，快照(付费)。
备注内容：经过和客服沟通建站的话需要备案接入，也有童鞋说不用接入就能用。
